
Content credentials Generated with AI ∙ September 15, 2024 at 10:03 PM
As Professor Cartland accurately stated in the beginning of this module, the way we find and communicate information on the web lies on a spectrum of truth. So how is a person to know whether the information we’re reading online is factual or merely a ruse to keep us locked in a cycle of doubt and uncertainty? My personal belief is to take everything I read online with a grain of salt, and do my own due diligence when it comes to matters that are important to me. I fact-check everything! But then again, maybe this is due to me having serious trust issues…
What is “Truth” Anyway?
Advertisements exaggerate the benefits of a specific item or service in order to grab the attention of consumers while headlines use clickbait titles to entice readers to follow their coverage of a particular news story over that of their competitors. While these examples aren’t directly harmful to the reader or consumer, there are other facets of the web that use the stretching of truth to manipulate the public for their own personal agendas. As explained in an article on the National Library of Medicine’s website titled, “Why do people spread false information online?”, there is a difference between misinformation, which is when people share information they don’t know to be false; and disinformation, where information is created and shared with the deliberate intention of provoking the public to react in a certain way in order to incite violence or cause harm to opposing factors, or as way to personally profit or benefit from the dissemination of the false information, either financially or politically.
The problem is that sometimes good people can be motivated to do bad things because they are blinded by misguided intentions, quite often misled by others with less scrupulous objectives. With little computer knowhow, someone can easily spread untruths in a matter of minutes with the help of social media and users biting at the bit to find proof that their way of thinking is validated. And really, that’s what it all comes down to – a sense of acceptance and validation of personal views and beliefs. A lie is just a lie if no one wants to believe it’s true, and it will die as quickly as it was born. However, for the person desperately seeking justification for their actions or approval of their (usually unpopular) opinions, a lie can spread like wildfire in a barren forest of other users seeking the same kind of validation.
As I mentioned earlier, there are a myriad of reasons why a person may knowingly share something untrue on the internet. Since the truth can be seen as a spectrum of relative accountability, where does someone draw the line between good marketing and downright lies? I believe the answer to that lies within the person’s intention, though you know what they say about those…
Where Do They Come Up With This Stuff??
Whatever the reasoning behind the spread of false information may be, whether it be intentional deception or unknowing ignorance, the outcome of such propagation has become a serious problem nationally and world-wide, as people turn to social media and online news outlets to guide their decision-making processes. It’s just too easy to take the word of a friend on social media or read the headlines of a shared article rather than do the work yourself and come up with your own answers and understanding of the situation. And even if you do take the initiative to look for the information yourself, can you trust the answers you find? A quick query into a search engine’s text box can populate a thousand different answers to your question, some of them might even be trustworthy. With AI seeping into every aspect of our lives, it’s easy to fall victim to complacency, especially if you are not well versed in the subject matter to discern any differently. That’s where AI is a blessing and a curse. It can make a task easier by providing quick tips and tricks to something you already knew something about [blessing] or provide hugely inaccurate information provided through unreliable sources at best, or at worst, shady conspiracy channels with evil intent.
Which again leads me to the matter of “intent” – the road to hell may be paved with good intentions, but it seems like the digital highway is just as tricky to navigate. I believe that if you go looking for bad, that’s all you will find; look for the good, and you’ll start to see more and more of it wherever you go.
AI: Help or Hindrance?
I’m not sure exactly how my interaction with Copilot ties in to the rest of this article, if it does at all, but here is my exchange with AI regarding the title of this op-ed.
Sent by you:
Take the internet with a grain of salt
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
Certainly! The phrase “take it with a grain of salt” means to view information skeptically or with doubt, understanding that it may not be entirely accurate or reliable1. When someone uses this expression, they are suggesting that the information provided may not be entirely credible and therefore should be received with reservation2. The idea behind this saying is to accept a statement while maintaining a degree of skepticism about its truth3. It’s like adding a pinch of skepticism to what you encounter online, just as you might add a grain of salt to food for better digestion34. So, next time you come across something on the internet, remember to take it with a grain of salt! 😉🌐
Learn more
1 grammarist.com2 quillbot.com3 phrases.org.uk4 mentalfloss.com5 bing.com6 en.wiktionary.org+2 more
You
Sent by you:
What is another way of saying that?
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
Certainly! Another way to express the same idea is to say “take it with a pinch of salt.” This phrase is often used interchangeably with “take it with a grain of salt” and conveys the same sense of skepticism or caution when evaluating information. So, whether you use a grain or a pinch, the message remains clear: approach information online with a healthy dose of skepticism! 😉🌐
You
Sent by you:
what is another way of saying "Be sceptical about what you read online?"
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
Certainly! Another way to express the idea of being skeptical about what you read online is to use the word “doubtful”. So, you could say, “Approach online information with a doubtful mindset.” Remember, it’s essential to critically evaluate the information we encounter on the internet! 🌐❓
Learn more
1 bing.com2 thesaurus.com3 powerthesaurus.org4 wordhippo.com5 wordhippo.com6 oxforddictionaries.com+3 more
You
Sent by you:
more ideas
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
Certainly! Here are a few more ways to express the concept of being skeptical about what you read online:
1. Exercise Caution: When encountering information on the internet, it’s essential to exercise caution and verify its accuracy.
2. Approach with Suspicion: Approach online content with a healthy dose of suspicion, especially when it lacks credible sources.
3. Be Wary: Be wary of information found online, as not everything is reliable or accurate.
4. Take Claims with a Grain of Salt: Just like seasoning food, take online claims with a grain of salt—meaning, maintain a degree of skepticism.
5. Question Everything: Adopt a mindset of questioning everything you come across online to separate fact from fiction.
Remember, critical thinking is key when navigating the vast sea of information on the internet! 🌐❓
You
Sent by you:
"Question Everything: Adopt a mindset of questioning everything you come across online to separate fact from fiction." More like this please
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
Certainly! Here are some additional ways to encourage a critical mindset when navigating online information:
1. Scrutinize Sources: Scrutinize the sources of information. Ask yourself: Is this from a reputable website or individual? Are there credible references or citations?
2. Verify Facts: Verify facts independently. Don’t take claims at face value. Use reliable fact-checking websites or cross-reference information from multiple sources.
3. Consider Bias: Be aware of bias. Every source has a perspective. Consider who benefits from the information and whether it’s presented objectively.
4. Evaluate Expertise: Assess the expertise of the author or organization. Are they qualified in the field they’re discussing?
5. Spot Misinformation: Be on the lookout for misinformation. False information spreads easily online. Verify before sharing.
6. Check Dates: Always check the publication date. Information can become outdated or irrelevant.
Remember, a curious and discerning mindset helps separate truth from fiction in the vast digital landscape! 🌐❓
You
Sent by you:
I'm writing an article based on this concept; can you give me a tantilizing title?
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
Certainly! Here’s a tantalizing title for your article on critical thinking and skepticism in the digital age:
“Unmasking the Web: Navigating Truth in a Sea of Fiction”
Feel free to tweak it to your liking, and happy writing! 🌐🔍📝
You
Sent by you:
I like that! Can you make it tie in to cooking somehow?
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
Certainly! Here’s a tantalizing title that combines the concept of critical thinking with the world of cooking:
“Seasoning the Truth: Navigating Online Recipes with a Pinch of Skepticism”
In this article, we’ll explore how critical thinking is like adding just the right amount of seasoning to your culinary adventures—essential for separating fact from fiction in the vast digital kitchen! 🌐🔍🍽️
You
Sent by you:
PERFECT!
Copilot
Sent by Copilot:
I’m delighted you liked it! If you need any more assistance or have further requests, feel free to ask. Happy writing, and may your culinary adventures be seasoned with wisdom! 🌐🔍🍽️✨
As you can see, it took several tries and different strategies to get Copilot to first understand what I was looking for, and then to come up with something that might gain a viewers attention but also fit my desired narrative. And ultimately, that is exactly how misinformation and false news is spread. All it takes is one person to put a little fire under the belly of the beast, and one hungry soul, looking to fatten the masses, to take the bait.
Also, if you can’t tell, I really like food and food analogies… 🤷♀️
Postscript: I had to include these AI generated images because they have absolutely nothing to do with my article, yet apparently Copilot thought they did, which just proves that AI isn’t perfect…but also AWWWWW!!!!



